I saw my friend’s name on my phone last week and my stomach tightened. Not because I don’t like them—I do. Not because they’d done anything wrong—they hadn’t. But because I knew, immediately and viscerally, that I needed to have a conversation with them about something that had been building for months.
And instead of answering, I let it go to voicemail. Again.
I told myself it wasn’t the right time. That I’d bring it up when we met in person. That it would probably resolve itself. That it wasn’t that urgent. All very reasonable-sounding justifications for avoiding something I knew needed to be said.
We all have at least one conversation we’re avoiding. You know exactly what it is. The person you need to talk to, the thing you need to say. And the avoidance is costing you more than the conversation would.
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately—how much mental energy we spend avoiding conversations we know we need to have. How we lie awake at night rehearsing what we’d say, then chicken out the moment we actually see the person. How we convince ourselves that silence is safer than honesty, even as the silence slowly corrodes the relationship or situation.
The conversation could be with a friend who’s hurt you. A partner about something that’s not working. A boss about boundaries that keep getting crossed. A family member about patterns that need to change. Or most commonly—with yourself, about truths you’re not ready to acknowledge.
But whatever the conversation is, you know what it is. Right now, reading this, you know. That’s the thing about the conversations we avoid—we always know. We just pretend we don’t.
That’s when I realized: The mental energy we spend avoiding a difficult conversation is almost always greater than the energy the actual conversation would require. But we keep avoiding it anyway, because avoidance feels safer than honesty.
Order my new book: Strategic Life: How to Build a Life That Matters
You Already Know What the Conversation Is
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: you don’t need me to tell you what conversation you’re avoiding. You already know.
Maybe it’s telling a friend that their constant criticism is affecting your relationship. Maybe it’s having the “this isn’t working” conversation with a romantic partner. Maybe it’s telling your boss that the workload has become unsustainable. Maybe it’s confronting a family member about behavior that’s been damaging for years.
Or maybe it’s a conversation with yourself—admitting that your current career path isn’t fulfilling you, that a friendship has become toxic, that you need to make a change you’ve been avoiding, that something needs to end even though ending it is scary.
Whatever it is, you know. You’ve known for weeks or months or maybe years. You’ve rehearsed versions of it in your head. You’ve imagined how it would go. You’ve composed and deleted text messages. You’ve started and stopped dozens of times.
The knowing is always there. It’s the doing that we avoid.
I’ve watched myself do this in so many situations. Knowing I need to set a boundary with someone but not wanting to seem difficult. Knowing I need to address a recurring problem but hoping it will somehow resolve itself. Knowing I need to be honest about what I’m feeling but fearing how the other person will react.
And the thing about knowing-but-not-doing is that it takes up constant mental space. The avoided conversation becomes background noise in every interaction with that person. You can’t fully relax, can’t be fully present, because part of you is always aware of the thing you’re not saying.
The Mental Energy of Avoidance
What I’ve come to understand is that avoiding a difficult conversation doesn’t actually save you energy—it just redistributes that energy into constant, low-grade anxiety.
Instead of having one hard conversation that takes an hour and then it’s done, you spend weeks or months carrying the weight of it. You think about it when you wake up. You rehearse it in the shower. You feel it in your stomach when you see the person’s name. You calculate whether you can avoid seeing them. You monitor every interaction for the right moment to bring it up, then decide the moment isn’t quite right.
All of this takes tremendous energy. Way more energy, actually, than just having the damn conversation would take.
I had a situation at work where I needed to address something with a colleague. A pattern of behavior that was creating problems for our team. I knew I needed to say something. I’d known for months. But every time I thought about bringing it up, I’d find a reason not to. Wrong timing. They seemed stressed. It could wait. Maybe it would get better on its own.
Meanwhile, I was spending hours of mental energy thinking about it. Getting frustrated when the behavior continued. Venting to other colleagues. Avoiding certain interactions because I didn’t want to deal with it. The avoidance was consuming far more of my energy than addressing it ever would have.
When I finally had the conversation—when I stopped avoiding and just said what needed to be said—it took twenty minutes. Twenty minutes to resolve something I’d been carrying for months. And the relief afterwards was immediate and enormous. Not just because the issue was addressed, but because I could stop spending energy avoiding it.
Why We Think Avoiding Protects Us
The reason we avoid difficult conversations is because we think avoidance protects us from something. Protects us from conflict, from uncomfortable emotions, from potentially damaging a relationship, from facing a truth we’re not ready to face.
And in the very short term, avoidance does protect us. It lets us not deal with difficulty right now. It lets us maintain a comfortable fiction. It lets us put off discomfort to some vague future moment.
But this protection is an illusion. Because while we’re avoiding the conversation, the underlying issue doesn’t go away. It usually gets worse. Resentments build. Patterns entrench. The gap between what we’re feeling and what we’re expressing widens. The relationship or situation deteriorates slowly instead of being addressed directly.
I’ve done this in relationships where I was unhappy but didn’t want to have the hard conversation about why. I thought avoiding it was protecting the relationship—if I didn’t bring it up, we could just keep going and maybe things would improve.
But they never improved. My unspoken unhappiness affected everything. I became more distant, less engaged, more irritable over small things. The relationship was deteriorating anyway, just more slowly and more painfully than if I’d been honest about what wasn’t working.
The avoidance didn’t protect the relationship. It just made its decline more prolonged and confusing for both of us. The thing I was trying to avoid—discomfort, potential conflict, possible ending—was happening anyway. I was just experiencing it in slow motion instead of facing it directly.
What You’re Actually Protecting
When you dig into why you’re avoiding a conversation, it’s rarely about protecting the other person or the relationship. It’s usually about protecting yourself from discomfort.
You don’t want to deal with their potential anger or hurt. You don’t want to sit with the awkwardness of honesty. You don’t want to face the possibility that things might change or end. You don’t want to be the one who brings up the hard thing.
And look, I get it. Those things are uncomfortable. I hate conflict. I hate disappointing people. I hate the vulnerable feeling of saying something difficult and not knowing how the other person will respond.
But here’s what I’ve learned: the discomfort of having the conversation is finite. It happens, it’s uncomfortable for a period of time, and then it’s over. The discomfort of avoiding the conversation is infinite. It continues every day, every interaction, every time you think about the situation. It never ends until you address it.
You’re protecting yourself from finite discomfort by choosing infinite discomfort. That’s not actually a good trade.
I had a friendship that needed to end. We’d grown in different directions, our values had diverged, spending time together had become draining rather than energizing. I knew this. But I couldn’t bring myself to have the conversation about it because I didn’t want to hurt their feelings, didn’t want to be the bad guy, didn’t want to deal with the awkwardness.
So instead, I just slowly faded. Responded less to messages. Was “busy” when they wanted to hang out. Let the friendship die slowly through neglect rather than ending it honestly.
And it felt terrible the entire time. Worse than just being honest would have felt. Because I was carrying guilt about the avoidance, discomfort with the dishonesty, and the same outcome anyway—the friendship ending. I’d just chosen the slow, painful, dishonest version instead of the quick, clean, honest version.
The Fantasy That It Will Resolve Itself
One of the most seductive lies we tell ourselves when avoiding conversations is that the issue will somehow resolve itself. That if we just wait long enough, things will get better without us having to do the uncomfortable work of addressing them.
This almost never happens.
Problems don’t typically resolve themselves. Patterns don’t spontaneously change. People don’t suddenly understand what you need without you telling them. The issue you’re avoiding will almost always still be there six months from now, probably worse, unless you actually address it.
I’ve watched friends stay in relationships that weren’t working for years, waiting for things to magically improve. I’ve watched colleagues avoid addressing workplace issues, hoping their boss would somehow intuit what they needed. I’ve watched family dynamics stay toxic for decades because everyone was waiting for someone else to change first.
And I’ve done this myself. Avoided conversations while secretly hoping the other person would just… figure it out. That they’d notice what was bothering me and fix it without me having to say anything. That time would somehow solve the problem.
But that’s magical thinking. Real problems require real conversations. Difficult issues require direct addressing. No amount of hoping and waiting will substitute for actually saying what needs to be said.
The fantasy that it will resolve itself is just another form of avoidance. A way to justify not having the conversation while feeling like you’re being strategic about timing. But you’re not waiting for the right moment—you’re waiting for a moment that will never come, a moment when the conversation won’t be hard, when the other person will be perfectly receptive, when you’ll feel completely ready.
That moment doesn’t exist. The conversation will be hard whenever you have it. The only question is whether you have it now or keep carrying it for months or years while waiting for an imaginary perfect moment.
The Relief When You Finally Have It
I can’t count the number of times I’ve avoided a conversation for weeks or months, finally forced myself to have it, and felt immediate overwhelming relief afterward.
Not because the conversation went perfectly—it often doesn’t. Not because everything was resolved—it often isn’t. But because the carrying is over. The mental weight of avoidance is gone. The thing I’d been dreading is no longer in the future—it’s in the past.
Even when the conversation is hard, even when it doesn’t go exactly how I hoped, the relief of having addressed it is profound. Because I’m no longer spending energy avoiding it. I’m no longer carrying the weight of the unsaid thing in every interaction.
I finally had that conversation with my friend. The one I’d been avoiding for months. I told them what had been bothering me, what I needed to change in our friendship. It was awkward. They were hurt initially. It wasn’t a fun conversation.
But afterwards? Relief. Immediate, overwhelming relief. Even though it was hard, even though it was uncomfortable, even though I didn’t know yet how things would ultimately land—the relief of no longer avoiding it was immense.
And here’s what happened: we worked it out. The friendship adjusted. Things got better. Not immediately, but over time. And it never would have gotten better if I’d kept avoiding the conversation. The avoidance was the thing preventing improvement, not protecting against damage.
This is almost always how it goes. The anticipation of the conversation is worse than the conversation itself. The mental energy of avoidance is worse than the energy of having it. And the relief afterwards, regardless of outcome, is worth the discomfort during.
Conversations With Others vs. Conversations With Yourself
The hardest conversations aren’t always with other people. Sometimes they’re with yourself.
The conversation where you admit that your current path isn’t working. That you need to make a change you’ve been avoiding. That something you’ve invested years in needs to end. That a choice you made was wrong and needs to be unmade.
These internal conversations can be even harder than external ones because you can’t avoid yourself. You carry yourself everywhere. And when you’re avoiding a truth you need to face, that avoidance becomes constant background noise in your own head.
I’ve avoided conversations with myself about career paths that weren’t right, relationships that weren’t working, choices that needed to be unmade. And the avoidance with yourself works the same way as avoidance with others—it doesn’t protect you from the truth, it just makes you carry the weight of not facing it.
I spent over a year avoiding the conversation with myself about whether I was in the right career direction. I had all the signals—I wasn’t excited about the work, I was dreading Mondays, I could see the path forward and it didn’t appeal to me. But admitting this felt like admitting failure, like wasting the time I’d already invested, like starting over.
So I avoided the internal conversation. Told myself it was just a rough patch. That I needed to push through. That next year would be better. All the while, the knowledge that something was fundamentally wrong was taking up constant mental space.
When I finally had the conversation with myself—when I sat down and honestly acknowledged what I already knew—it was painful. But it was also clarifying. Once I stopped avoiding the truth, I could start making choices based on it. The avoidance was the only thing preventing me from moving forward.
Link to My Book: New Day, My Way, Your Life
Strategic Timing vs. Perpetual Avoidance
Now, here’s the nuance: I’m not saying every difficult thing needs to be said immediately, regardless of context. There is such a thing as strategic timing.
If someone is going through a crisis, maybe wait until they’re more stable. If emotions are running extremely high, maybe pause until everyone can engage more rationally. If you need time to get clear on what you actually want to say, taking that time makes sense.
Strategic timing is about choosing the right moment to have a necessary conversation. Perpetual avoidance is about finding reasons to never have it at all.
The difference is in the intention. Strategic timing says “I will have this conversation, and I’m choosing when based on what will make it most productive.” Perpetual avoidance says “maybe I don’t need to have this conversation at all, maybe it will just go away.”
I’ve learned to check my intention. Am I truly waiting for a better moment, or am I just avoiding discomfort? Is there a legitimate reason to wait, or am I manufacturing reasons to postpone indefinitely?
Usually, if I’m honest with myself, I’m avoiding rather than strategically timing. The “not the right moment” is just a more palatable way of saying “I don’t want to do this hard thing.”
And the thing about perpetual avoidance disguised as strategic timing is that you can do it forever. There will always be a reason why now isn’t quite the right time. They’re stressed about work. The holidays are coming up. They just had something else difficult happen. You don’t want to add to their burden.
All of which can be true. But if you wait until the perfect moment when nothing else is going on and everyone is in ideal emotional states, you’ll wait forever. Life doesn’t provide perfect moments for difficult conversations. You have to create the moment by actually having the conversation.
The Conversations That Changed Things
Looking back at my life, the moments of real change almost always came after conversations I’d been avoiding.
The conversation with a partner about what wasn’t working that led to either fixing it or honestly ending it. The conversation with a boss about boundaries that changed how I worked. The conversation with a friend about patterns that were damaging our relationship. The conversation with myself about needing to change direction.
None of these conversations were comfortable in the moment. But all of them created necessary change that was being blocked by my avoidance.
The uncomfortable truth is that growth usually requires difficult conversations. Change usually requires saying things that feel risky to say. Improvement in relationships usually requires honesty about what’s not working.
You can’t optimize your way around this. You can’t think your way through it. You can’t wait for it to somehow become comfortable. At some point, you just have to have the conversation you’ve been avoiding.
I think about all the time I’ve wasted avoiding conversations that turned out to be much less terrible than I’d built them up to be. All the energy I’ve spent carrying things that could have been addressed in a twenty-minute conversation. All the relationships I’ve let deteriorate slowly rather than addressing issues directly.
And I think about the times I finally worked up the courage to say what needed to be said—how often those conversations led to relief, clarity, positive change. How rare it was for the conversation to be as catastrophic as I’d feared. How the anticipation was almost always worse than the reality.
Permission to Initiate the Hard Conversation
Here’s what I want you to know: You don’t have to wait for the perfect moment. You don’t have to have it all figured out. You’re allowed to initiate the conversation you’ve been avoiding, even if it’s uncomfortable, even if you’re scared of the outcome.
You’re allowed to tell someone that something isn’t working and needs to change. You’re allowed to set boundaries that feel uncomfortable to articulate. You’re allowed to be honest about what you need instead of hoping they’ll figure it out.
You’re allowed to have the conversation with yourself that you’ve been avoiding—admitting that something needs to change, that a choice was wrong, that you need to take a different path.
The discomfort of having the conversation is temporary. The relief of no longer avoiding it is lasting. The mental energy you’ll free up by addressing it rather than carrying it is enormous.
And here’s what I’ve learned about difficult conversations: they’re almost never as catastrophic as you fear. Yes, they’re uncomfortable. Yes, there’s risk. Yes, the outcome isn’t guaranteed. But the catastrophic scenarios you’ve been rehearsing in your head rarely actually happen.
Most people are more understanding than you think. Most situations are more workable than you fear. Most conversations lead to either improvement or clarity, both of which are better than the indefinite ambiguity of avoidance.
And even in the worst case—even if the conversation goes poorly, even if it ends a relationship, even if it creates conflict—you’re still better off than you were spending months or years avoiding it. Because at least you’re dealing with reality rather than carrying the weight of the unsaid.
The Conversation You’re Avoiding Right Now
You know what it is. You’ve known the entire time you’ve been reading this.
Maybe it’s with someone specific about something specific. Maybe it’s with yourself about a truth you haven’t wanted to face. Maybe you’ve been avoiding it for weeks, maybe for years. But you know what it is.
And you have a choice. You can keep avoiding it, keep carrying the weight of the unsaid, keep spending mental energy on managing the avoidance. Or you can decide that today—or this week, or this month—is when you finally have it.
You don’t need to have it perfectly. You don’t need to wait for ideal circumstances. You don’t need to have every word scripted. You just need to stop avoiding and start engaging.
Say the thing you’ve been afraid to say. Ask the question you’ve been afraid to ask. Acknowledge the truth you’ve been avoiding. Have the conversation that would change everything.
Because the longer you avoid it, the heavier it gets. The longer you wait, the more mental energy you spend carrying it. The longer you stay silent, the more the underlying issue entrenches.
And the relief when you finally address it—regardless of how the conversation goes—is worth every moment of discomfort during it.
What’s Actually on the Other Side
Here’s what I’ve learned about the conversations we avoid: what’s on the other side is almost always better than the indefinite state of avoidance, even when the conversation itself is hard.
Sometimes what’s on the other side is resolution—the issue is addressed, the relationship adjusts, things improve. Sometimes it’s clarity—you understand where you stand, what’s possible, what needs to happen next. Sometimes it’s an ending—the relationship or situation ends, but honestly rather than through slow deterioration.
All of these outcomes are better than perpetual avoidance. Even the painful outcomes are better than the chronic pain of carrying the unsaid.
I don’t know what your specific avoided conversation is. I don’t know how it will go if you have it. I can’t promise it will be easy or that everything will work out perfectly.
But I can promise that the relief of no longer avoiding it will be profound. That the mental energy you free up will be enormous. That the clarity on the other side—whatever form it takes—will be worth the discomfort of getting there.
You’ve been carrying this long enough. You’ve spent enough energy avoiding it. You know what needs to be said.
So say it. Have the conversation. Face the thing you’ve been avoiding. And discover that the anticipation was worse than the reality, that the carrying was harder than the doing, that the relief of addressing it is worth every moment of discomfort.
The conversation you’re avoiding is costing you more than having it would cost. So stop avoiding. Start engaging. Have the conversation that would change everything.
Because it will. One way or another, it will.
Subscribe to my newsletter:
Join 600,000+ readers who get wisdom from ordinary experiences delivered twice a week.
Leave a Reply